Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has publicly called on Russian President Vladimir Putin to meet face-to-face in a neutral country to discuss ending the war, marking one of his most direct appeals to the Kremlin since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022.
In an open letter dated June 4, Zelensky proposed direct negotiations between the two leaders and urged Putin to agree to a clear date for talks. The Ukrainian leader said the meeting should not take place in either Kyiv or Moscow, suggesting Switzerland, Turkey or Arab states as possible hosts. Reuters and AP both reported that the letter was addressed directly to Putin and framed as a serious peace proposal.
“I am proposing a meeting,” Zelensky wrote, according to reporting on the letter. He argued that major decisions in war and peace are ultimately resolved by leaders, not only by lower-level delegations.
The proposal comes as the war has entered a new phase. Ukraine has used long-range drone and missile strikes to put more pressure on Russian infrastructure, while Russia has intensified missile and drone attacks across Ukrainian cities. Zelensky suggested that Ukraine’s improved ability to strike deeper inside Russia has changed the strategic balance, even as Kyiv continues to suffer heavy losses.
TRENDING TODAY
Zelensky also acknowledged shifting global attention. With the Trump administration heavily focused on the Iran war and broader Middle East diplomacy, he argued that Ukraine should not simply wait for Washington to return its full attention to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Instead, he said the moment called for direct action and diplomacy.
President Donald Trump reacted positively to the idea of direct talks, saying it “would be great” if Putin and Zelensky met and adding that both sides would need to make compromises. Trump declined to describe the specific concessions he had suggested, but said he had raised compromise ideas with the parties. AP reported that Trump urged the two leaders to “get it done.”
The letter was also a sweeping criticism of Putin’s time in power. Zelensky accused the Russian leader of turning relations between Russia and Ukraine into a long conflict and warned that Moscow may be preparing to prolong the war into 2027 or 2028. He claimed Ukrainian intelligence indicates Russia is increasingly relying on ballistic missile strikes because its ground campaign has failed to achieve its objectives.
Zelensky also accused Moscow of trying to pull Belarus deeper into the conflict and destabilize Transnistria, the Russian-backed breakaway region of Moldova. Those claims reflect Kyiv’s long-running concern that Russia could widen the conflict or use neighboring territories to apply pressure on Ukraine and Europe.
The Ukrainian president argued that Russia is now paying a rising price for the war. He pointed to Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russian territory, economic pressure, fuel shortages, rising prices and growing military losses. Reuters reported that Zelensky described Russian society as increasingly tired of the war and said Ukraine was ready for a full ceasefire during negotiations.
Zelensky claimed Russia suffered more than 30,000 soldiers killed or seriously wounded in May alone, though battlefield casualty numbers from either side are difficult to independently verify. He said Ukraine also continues to endure painful losses, even while arguing that Russia is losing far more troops.
The Ukrainian leader also proposed several immediate steps that could accompany talks. According to AP, Zelensky said Ukraine would agree to a full ceasefire during negotiations and proposed an “all-for-all” prisoner exchange, along with discussions on the return of civilians and children taken by Russia.
The Kremlin acknowledged receiving the letter, according to Reuters, but Moscow’s response remained uncertain. Russian officials have repeatedly said they are open to talks only under conditions that Ukraine and its allies view as unacceptable, including recognition of Russian control over occupied Ukrainian territory.
The proposed location of the talks is also important. By ruling out both Moscow and Kyiv, Zelensky appeared to be trying to avoid symbolism that would make either side appear subordinate. Switzerland and Turkey have both played diplomatic roles in past Ukraine-related talks, while Arab states have increasingly positioned themselves as possible mediators in global conflicts.
The letter may also be aimed at shaping international opinion. By publicly offering direct talks, Zelensky can argue that Ukraine is not refusing diplomacy. If Putin rejects the proposal, Kyiv may use that response to argue that Moscow is the side prolonging the war.
For Trump, a Zelensky-Putin meeting would fit his stated desire to end the war, but it could also create diplomatic pressure. Trump has repeatedly said both sides must compromise, while Ukraine has insisted that any settlement must protect its sovereignty and security. The challenge will be whether Washington pushes for a ceasefire that Ukraine sees as fair or one that freezes Russian gains.
The timing is also significant because Ukraine has recently gained attention in Washington after the House passed a new Ukraine aid and Russia sanctions bill with support from 18 Republicans. That vote showed that despite Trump’s more cautious approach, some members of Congress still want to strengthen Kyiv’s hand.
Whether Putin accepts Zelensky’s offer remains unclear. But the public letter adds a new diplomatic move to a war that has been dominated for months by strikes, battlefield attrition and competing peace proposals.
Zelensky’s message was direct: Ukraine is willing to meet, but not to surrender. The next question is whether Moscow sees talks as useful — or whether it believes it can still achieve more by continuing the war.
Why It Matters
Zelensky’s letter matters because it puts a direct peace proposal in front of Putin while publicly challenging Moscow to respond. If Russia refuses, Ukraine can argue that it is the side seeking serious negotiations.
It also matters because the war is increasingly tied to other global crises. With the Trump administration focused on Iran and broader Middle East tensions, Ukraine is trying to keep its war from slipping down the international agenda.
What Comes Next
Russia’s response will determine whether the proposal becomes a real diplomatic opening or another failed peace overture. If Putin agrees, talks could take place in a neutral country such as Switzerland, Turkey or an Arab state.
If Moscow rejects the proposal or demands unacceptable conditions, Ukraine is likely to continue pressing allies for more military support, sanctions on Russia and security guarantees ahead of any future negotiations.
Zelensky publicly called for face-to-face negotiations with Putin, saying direct talks are needed to address the key issues of the war.
Zelensky calls for face-to-face negotiations to end war in public letter to Putin https://t.co/RKd9GQml9K pic.twitter.com/81ToPFgNQr
— New York Post (@nypost) June 5, 2026
