The Trump administration is moving toward a new round of tariffs on dozens of U.S. trading partners, including the United Kingdom, Canada, the European Union, Australia, Japan, Taiwan and China, citing concerns that some countries have not done enough to block goods allegedly made with forced labor from entering global supply chains.
The proposed measures would add new import duties of either 10% or 12.5% on goods from 60 economies, according to reports on the U.S. Trade Representative’s latest findings. The plan is being framed by the administration as a labor and trade enforcement action, but critics argue it could also serve as a new legal route for President Donald Trump to revive parts of his broader tariff agenda after earlier measures faced major court challenges.
The tariffs would not take effect immediately. They remain subject to a public comment and review process, meaning affected governments, businesses and trade groups still have an opportunity to push back before any final decision is made.
At the center of the proposal is a Section 301 investigation under the Trade Act of 1974. That law allows the U.S. government to examine whether another country’s trade practices are unreasonable, discriminatory, or harmful to American commerce. In this case, the administration is focusing on whether trading partners have imposed and effectively enforced bans on imports tied to forced labor.
TRENDING TODAY
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer defended the move, arguing that weak enforcement abroad creates unfair competition for American workers and businesses. The administration’s position is that goods produced under coercive labor conditions can enter global markets at artificially low costs, placing companies that follow stricter labor standards at a disadvantage.
The proposal reportedly divides targeted economies into two tariff groups. Countries and jurisdictions such as the UK, EU, Canada, Mexico and Taiwan could face an additional 10% duty, while others including China, Japan, India, South Korea, Brazil and Switzerland could face a 12.5% tariff. Australia has also been reported among the countries facing higher proposed duties.
The plan has already triggered international criticism. The European Union said it shares U.S. concerns about forced labor but considers tariffs imposed on that basis to be unjustified. EU officials also argued that Washington should respect existing trade arrangements, including a tariff agreement reached last year that set limits on duties affecting many European goods.
The UK government also pushed back, saying it has already taken action against forced labor and modern slavery through existing legislation, including the Modern Slavery Act. British officials said they remain in regular talks with the U.S. administration and emphasized that current preferential access for UK businesses remains unchanged for now.
Canada may face a more complicated position. While reports suggest Canada has laws addressing forced-labor imports, the White House reportedly believes enforcement has been insufficient. The EU faces a similar challenge because its bloc-wide forced-labor import ban is not expected to fully apply until December 2027.
The tariff threat comes after several legal setbacks for Trump’s earlier trade measures. Courts have questioned or limited previous attempts to impose broad tariffs, forcing the administration to search for alternative legal authorities. By using forced-labor enforcement as the basis for the new duties, the White House may be trying to build a narrower legal argument that can survive judicial review.
Business groups are likely to watch the process closely. New tariffs could raise costs for importers, disrupt supply chains and increase uncertainty for companies that rely on goods from multiple regions. Consumers could also feel the impact if businesses pass higher import costs into final prices.
At the same time, forced labor remains a serious global trade concern. Governments around the world have faced growing pressure to prevent goods linked to coercive labor practices from entering their markets. The debate now is whether tariffs are the right tool to address that problem, or whether they risk becoming another weapon in a wider trade dispute.
For now, the proposal remains a warning rather than a final policy. But because it targets some of America’s closest allies as well as major economic competitors, it could quickly become one of the most contentious trade fights of Trump’s current term.
Why It Matters
The proposed tariffs could reshape trade relations between the United States and many of its closest economic partners. If implemented, the duties may increase costs for businesses, create diplomatic tension and test how far the administration can go in using labor standards as a basis for trade penalties.
The move also matters because it shows how Trump’s team may try to continue its protectionist trade strategy despite court-imposed limits on previous tariff actions. By linking the new measures to forced-labor enforcement, the administration is attempting to present the tariffs as both an economic and ethical response.
What Comes Next
The proposal will go through a public comment and review process before any final action is taken. Affected governments are expected to lobby against the tariffs, while U.S. businesses may warn about higher costs and supply-chain disruption.
The key questions now are whether the administration will narrow the list of affected countries, whether allies such as the UK, Canada and EU can negotiate exemptions, and whether any final tariffs will face new legal challenges in U.S. courts.
Reuters reported that the Trump administration proposed additional duties on imports from 60 economies after determining that some countries’ efforts to curb trade in goods made with forced labor were unreasonable or restrictive to U.S. commerce.
The Trump administration proposed imposing additional duties of 10% or 12.5% on imports from 60 economies after determining their failures to curb trade in goods made with forced labor are unreasonable and restrict US commerce https://t.co/0EILbO9HuT pic.twitter.com/OzTxWj3dsn
— Reuters (@Reuters) June 3, 2026
