newsletter

Former Louisiana Mayor Sentenced to 90 Days in Jail in Teen Sex Case

A former Louisiana mayor has been sentenced to 90 days in jail after being convicted of felony charges tied to a sexual encounter with a 16-year-old boy during a party at her home.

Misty Roberts, the former mayor of DeRidder, was convicted in March of carnal knowledge of a juvenile and indecent behavior with a juvenile. The case involved a July 2024 party at Roberts’ home, where prosecutors said alcohol was present and where the teenage victim was a guest.

Judge D. Kent Savoie sentenced Roberts this week to 90 days in jail, along with two five-year suspended sentences. She was also ordered to register as a sex offender, complete therapy, pay fines, and submit to regular drug and alcohol testing.

The sentence was far below what prosecutors had requested. Prosecutors reportedly asked for the maximum sentence of up to 17 years in prison, arguing that Roberts had not shown enough accountability for her actions.

The case drew strong reactions because Roberts was an elected official at the time of the incident and because the victim was a teenager who had attended a party connected to her family. Roberts had led DeRidder, a city in western Louisiana, before resigning shortly before her arrest.

During sentencing, the victim’s mother delivered an emotional statement and criticized Roberts harshly. She argued that Roberts did not look like the kind of person many people imagine when they think of a predator, warning the courtroom that danger does not always appear obvious.

The victim’s family said the case caused lasting harm and public embarrassment. The teen’s mother described emotional damage affecting her son’s school life and social life after the incident became public.

Evidence presented during the trial included witness testimony, text messages and statements from members of Roberts’ family. Reports said jurors heard that Roberts’ children witnessed parts of the incident or its aftermath. Her ex-husband also testified that Roberts had confessed the sexual encounter to him.

Prosecutors argued that text messages showed adults and teenagers coordinating the party, including discussion of alcohol. The case became especially disturbing to many residents because the party was held at Roberts’ home and involved teenagers connected to her family.

Roberts addressed the court before sentencing and apologized to the victim’s family. She described herself as an embarrassment to the city and said she would blame herself for the rest of her life. She also asked the judge for “grace and mercy,” saying she wanted the opportunity to continue being a mother.

Roberts also admitted during sentencing that she had asked others to lie after the incident, saying she was afraid of losing access to her children. Prosecutors used that admission to argue that she had tried to avoid responsibility.

The judge ultimately chose a sentence that included jail time but avoided the lengthy prison term sought by prosecutors. The suspended sentences mean Roberts could face additional prison time if she violates the terms of her sentence or probation.

The sentence has drawn criticism from some members of the public and from those who believe the punishment was too lenient given the nature of the charges. Local residents interviewed by Louisiana outlets expressed disappointment, with some describing the sentence as too light.

The case also raises broader questions about how courts handle sex crimes involving minors when the offender is a woman and a former public official. Critics argue that cases involving female offenders and male teenage victims are sometimes treated less harshly than similar cases involving adult male defendants.

Supporters of the judge’s discretion may argue that sentencing decisions depend on state law, criminal history, risk assessment, the details of the case and the terms imposed beyond jail time, including sex offender registration and supervision.

Still, the sentence has become controversial because of the gap between the prosecution’s request and the punishment imposed.

Roberts’ conviction remains a major fall from public office. She once served as the top elected official in DeRidder and was responsible for leading the city government. Now, she must serve jail time, register as a sex offender and comply with court-ordered treatment and testing.

The case is likely to remain a point of public debate in Louisiana because of the age of the victim, the public role Roberts once held, and the sentence handed down.

Why It Matters

This matters because the case involves a former elected official convicted of felony sex crimes involving a minor. The sentence has sparked public debate over accountability, victim impact and whether the punishment was strong enough.

It also matters because the case challenges assumptions about who can be an offender and how sex crimes involving teenage male victims are treated in court and public discussion.

What Comes Next

Roberts must serve the jail sentence and comply with the court’s conditions, including sex offender registration, therapy, fines and regular drug and alcohol testing.

If she violates the terms of her suspended sentence or probation, she could face additional prison time. Public reaction to the sentence is likely to continue, especially in DeRidder and across Louisiana.

Roberts appeared in court for sentencing after being convicted on felony charges involving a 16-year-old boy, receiving 90 days in jail and sex offender registration.

Continue Scrolling for the Comments