President Donald Trump is urging congressional Republicans to quickly pass another major budget reconciliation package, this time combining $350 billion in new defense spending with stalled election-related legislation. But the proposal is already running into skepticism from members of his own party.
Trump called on Republicans to move “immediately” on what he described as a third reconciliation bill, framing the measure as essential to building what he called an “Arsenal of Freedom.” The president said the package would help move the United States toward a $1.5 trillion military budget and would represent a generational investment in national defense.
“This is a GENERATIONAL Investment in our Military, even bigger than President Reagan’s,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, arguing that a third reconciliation bill is the only path to reach the military funding level he wants.
The proposal comes shortly after Trump signed a separate $70 billion enforcement package funding Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Border Patrol through the rest of his presidency. Earlier, Republicans also passed Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” through reconciliation, a process that allows certain budget-related legislation to bypass the Senate’s 60-vote threshold and pass with a simple majority.
TRENDING TODAY
Now, Trump wants Republicans to use that same process again.
The new package would reportedly include $350 billion in defense spending and the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility, or SAVE, America Act. The SAVE Act has been a major priority for Trump and his allies, with provisions focused on voter ID, proof of citizenship, and election verification rules. Democrats strongly oppose the measure, arguing it would restrict voting access and create unnecessary barriers for eligible voters.
Because Democrats are unlikely to support the package, Trump is pushing Republicans to rely on reconciliation. But many GOP lawmakers are not convinced that another party-line bill is realistic, especially with the November midterm elections approaching and the congressional calendar shrinking.
Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana said passing major legislation before the midterms is unlikely.
“I think it’s a very, very long shot that anything passes between now and the midterms,” Kennedy said, adding that the political reality “gives me heartburn.”
Senate Majority Leader John Thune also stopped short of fully backing another reconciliation effort. He said Republicans would need a bill they can actually win on, noting that some members of the conference have already expressed concerns about moving forward.
The skepticism is especially important because reconciliation requires near-total party unity. With narrow margins in Congress, even a small number of Republican holdouts could block the package. That makes the path difficult for any proposal combining major defense spending with controversial election legislation.
Some senior Republicans have also questioned whether reconciliation is the right tool for defense funding. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, said reconciliation is “not the best approach.” Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has also expressed doubts about using the process as a vehicle for large defense spending increases.
Their concern is partly institutional. Defense spending is traditionally handled through the regular appropriations process, where lawmakers debate annual funding levels, military priorities, and oversight requirements. Using reconciliation could move spending faster, but critics argue it may weaken the normal budget process and create instability in long-term military planning.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has sounded more optimistic. Discussions about a third reconciliation package were already underway in the House before Trump publicly endorsed the idea, and Johnson has suggested that the chamber could move a bill by the August recess.
Still, some House Republicans are not fully sold. Rep. Nick Langworthy of New York said he had not yet heard enough policy proposals to believe the package would come together, though he remained open-minded. Rep. Kevin Kiley of California, a Republican-turned-independent, criticized the broader habit of using reconciliation whenever one party takes power, saying it contributes to dysfunction in Washington.
The debate comes at a tense moment for Republicans. Trump remains the dominant figure in the party, but his legislative demands are testing GOP unity. Lawmakers are already balancing defense priorities, election legislation, immigration enforcement, spending concerns, and political risk ahead of the midterms.
Supporters of Trump’s plan argue that the U.S. military needs a major funding boost to respond to threats from China, Russia, Iran, and other adversaries. They say the package could strengthen shipbuilding, missile defense, space capabilities, drones, and broader military readiness.
Critics inside the GOP are not necessarily opposed to higher defense spending. Many support strengthening the military. Their concerns are more about timing, process, cost, and whether combining defense spending with the SAVE Act makes the bill harder to pass.
The SAVE Act itself could also create procedural issues. Reconciliation rules limit what can be included in a bill, and provisions that do not directly affect federal spending or revenue can be challenged in the Senate. That means parts of the election legislation could face hurdles even if Republicans agree politically.
For Trump, the proposal serves both policy and political purposes. It lets him argue that Republicans are fighting for military strength, election integrity, and a more aggressive national security agenda. But for congressional Republicans, the question is whether another reconciliation fight is worth the risk just months before voters decide control of Congress.
The coming weeks will show whether Trump’s pressure can force the party into alignment or whether GOP skepticism prevents the “Arsenal of Freedom” plan from advancing.
Why It Matters
This matters because Trump is pushing Republicans to combine two major priorities — defense expansion and election-law changes — into one fast-track legislative package. If it succeeds, it could reshape military funding and voter verification policy before the midterms.
It also matters because the response from Republicans shows that party unity is not guaranteed. Even with Trump urging immediate action, some GOP lawmakers are warning that another reconciliation bill may be too difficult, too risky, or procedurally flawed.
What Comes Next
House Republicans may continue drafting a third reconciliation package, especially if Speaker Mike Johnson follows through on efforts to move a bill before the August recess. But the Senate remains a major obstacle.
The next key question is whether GOP leaders can produce a package that satisfies Trump, defense hawks, fiscal conservatives, and lawmakers worried about the midterm calendar. If they cannot, the proposal may remain more of a campaign message than a legislative reality.
A reposted version of Trump’s Truth Social statement circulated online, showing the president calling for a third reconciliation package focused on defense spending and election legislation.
President Trump has demanded that Republicans in Congress immediately pass a historic $350 billion budget reconciliation package (Recon 3.0) to build a staggering $1.5 trillion military arsenal. 🇺🇸
The directive supercharges American industry by funding the Next-Gen F-47 fighter… pic.twitter.com/iD8k333LlF
— Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial (@TruthTrumpPost) June 11, 2026
