The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s attempt to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants and some temporary foreign residents.
In a major ruling, the court said Trump’s executive order violated the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to people born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction. The decision preserves a long-standing interpretation of the Constitution and blocks one of the most aggressive parts of Trump’s second-term immigration agenda.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Amy Coney Barrett. Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the judgment in part but argued the order violated federal law rather than the Constitution. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented.
Trump issued the executive order on the first day of his second term, arguing that children born in the U.S. should not automatically receive citizenship if neither parent is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. The order would also have affected children born to some parents with temporary legal status. Civil-rights groups, immigrant families and several states challenged the policy, warning it could leave hundreds of thousands of children in legal uncertainty.
TRENDING TODAY
The majority rejected the administration’s argument that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excludes children of undocumented or temporary residents. Roberts wrote that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are still subject to U.S. jurisdiction and therefore citizens at birth under the 14th Amendment.
The ruling is one of the most consequential immigration decisions in years. Birthright citizenship has been treated as a core constitutional rule for generations, rooted in the post-Civil War amendment that overturned the Supreme Court’s infamous Dred Scott decision and guaranteed citizenship to formerly enslaved people and their descendants.
The Trump administration had argued that the amendment had been misread for decades and that citizenship should depend more heavily on the legal status or permanent residence of parents. The court’s majority rejected that view, saying the constitutional text and history do not support such a limitation.
Civil-rights groups celebrated the decision as a major victory. The American Civil Liberties Union, which helped challenge the order, said the ruling confirmed that a president cannot rewrite the Constitution through executive action. Democrats also praised the decision, arguing that it protected one of the country’s most basic legal guarantees.
Trump criticized the ruling and called on Congress to take up the issue. He suggested that lawmakers could pass legislation to narrow birthright citizenship, though any statutory change would almost certainly face immediate legal challenges because the court’s ruling is grounded in the Constitution.
Republicans who support ending or limiting birthright citizenship said the current system has been abused and argued that Congress should revisit the issue. Critics of that position say the Constitution is clear and that changing birthright citizenship would require a constitutional amendment, not a simple law.
For ordinary families, the decision provides clarity. Children born in the United States will continue to be recognized as U.S. citizens regardless of whether their parents are undocumented, temporary residents or noncitizens, with only narrow historical exceptions such as children of foreign diplomats.
The ruling also prevents major administrative disruption. Had Trump’s order taken effect, hospitals, states and federal agencies would have faced difficult questions about birth certificates, passports, Social Security numbers and eligibility for public services. Families could have been forced into legal battles over the status of newborn children.
The decision does not end the broader political fight over immigration. Trump and his allies are likely to keep pushing for stricter rules, while Democrats and civil-rights groups will frame the ruling as a defense of constitutional equality. The issue may now move to Congress, even if the path for changing the rule remains legally uncertain.
Some questions still remain about whether lawmakers will attempt a new statute, how far future administrations may try to test the ruling, and whether conservative legal groups will search for another case to reopen the debate. But for now, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the core rule: nearly everyone born on U.S. soil is an American citizen.
Why It Matters
The ruling protects birthright citizenship for children born in the United States and blocks a major part of Trump’s immigration agenda. It affects immigrant families, state governments, hospitals, federal agencies and the broader constitutional debate over who belongs as an American citizen.
What Comes Next
Trump is likely to pressure Congress to pursue legislation targeting birthright citizenship, while civil-rights groups will prepare to challenge any new effort. The ruling also gives states and federal agencies clear guidance that citizenship by birth remains protected under the 14th Amendment.
Some conservative justices dissented from the ruling, arguing that the court’s interpretation of birthright citizenship should not stand.
🚨 WOW! Justices Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito just went MAXIMUM BASED on the Supreme Court against birthright citizenship for illegal invaders
“Clarence Thomas writes a 91 PAGE DISSENT:”
THOMAS: “I am NOT sure that today’s opinion will stand the test of time. The citizenship… pic.twitter.com/3flQGTWaYp
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 30, 2026
