President Donald Trump’s nominee to permanently serve as inspector general at the Department of Justice faced sharp criticism from Democratic senators after declining to describe the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol as an “attack.”
Don Berthiaume, a longtime Justice Department employee who has been serving as acting inspector general, appeared before senators Wednesday as part of his confirmation process. The inspector general role is designed to be an independent watchdog inside the Justice Department, with authority to investigate misconduct, waste, abuse and political interference.
During the hearing, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut pressed Berthiaume on whether he accepted basic facts about the 2020 election and the violence at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Berthiaume said Joe Biden won the 2020 election “as certified by the Senate.” But when Blumenthal asked whether the Capitol was attacked on January 6, Berthiaume declined to use that word.
TRENDING TODAY
“I don’t know if I would use the term ‘attack,’” Berthiaume said, according to reporting on the hearing. He described the events as “activity outside the Capitol, protests and such,” while later acknowledging that physical violence occurred.
Blumenthal pushed back strongly, calling the wording an obvious understatement. He argued that Berthiaume’s refusal to use the word “attack” raised questions about whether he would be independent enough to serve as the Justice Department’s internal watchdog.
The exchange is politically significant because January 6 remains one of the central dividing lines in American politics. More than 1,000 people were charged in connection with the Capitol riot, including defendants convicted of assaulting police officers, obstructing Congress and entering restricted areas. Trump later pardoned or commuted sentences for nearly all of them after returning to office.
Berthiaume’s answer is also notable because official government reports and court records have repeatedly described January 6 as an attack on the Capitol. A bipartisan Senate report from 2021 called it a “violent and unprecedented attack” on the Capitol, the vice president, members of Congress and the democratic process.
The confirmation hearing comes as the Justice Department faces intense scrutiny over independence under Trump’s second administration. Critics say the department has been used to pursue the president’s political priorities, while Trump and his allies argue that the department is being reformed after years of what they call anti-conservative bias.
Berthiaume has not been viewed as one of Trump’s most overtly political nominees. Some lawmakers and observers have described him as a career official rather than a high-profile loyalist. That made his refusal to call January 6 an attack more striking to Democrats, who framed the moment as a test of whether he would acknowledge politically uncomfortable facts.
The inspector general position matters because the office can investigate misconduct inside the Justice Department and the FBI. At a time when the department is handling politically sensitive matters involving January 6 defendants, election claims, FBI leadership and Trump’s critics, the independence of the watchdog role is especially important.
Supporters of Berthiaume may argue that he was trying to avoid politically loaded language and focus on legal terminology rather than public debate. Critics, however, say the violence against police officers, the breach of the Capitol and the disruption of election certification make the word “attack” appropriate and factual.
The hearing may complicate Berthiaume’s confirmation, though Republicans control the process and may still support him. Democrats are likely to keep pressing him on whether he can investigate politically sensitive matters without minimizing events central to Trump’s political narrative.
For now, the controversy gives senators a clear question: can a Justice Department watchdog remain independent if he appears reluctant to describe January 6 in the same terms used by official government investigations?
Why It Matters
The exchange matters because the Justice Department inspector general is supposed to serve as an independent check on misconduct and abuse inside one of the country’s most powerful agencies. If senators believe the nominee is unwilling to acknowledge established facts about January 6, they may question his ability to investigate politically sensitive matters.
It also matters because January 6 remains central to debates over Trump’s pardons, federal prosecutions, police violence and whether the Justice Department can operate independently from White House politics.
What Comes Next
Berthiaume’s nomination will continue through the Senate confirmation process. Democrats are expected to use the hearing exchange to argue that he failed an independence test, while Republicans may defend him as a career Justice Department official.
If confirmed, Berthiaume could face immediate pressure to show independence in investigations involving the FBI, January 6-related matters and politically charged Justice Department decisions.
During a Senate confirmation hearing, Don Berthiaume declined to call January 6 an “attack,” describing it instead as “protest activity” outside the Capitol.
BLUMENTHAL: Was the Capitol attacked on January 6?
BERTHIAUME: Uh. We had activity outside the Capitol, protests and such
BLUMENTHAL: Was the Capitol attacked? You’re supposed to be the inspector general
BERTHIAUME: There was protest activity pic.twitter.com/81IG1JsSSn
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 17, 2026
